Lunsford v. Reynolds

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “occasional incidents of a foreign object contained in food, while regrettable, does not present a question of constitutional proportion”
• collecting cases about food contaminated with rats, bugs, hair, rocks, glass, and metal, as well as raw or spoiled food
• “Occasional incidents of foreign objects contained in food, while regrettable, does not present a question of constitutional proportion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).