Lum v. Stinnett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an argument was not waived where its gravamen had been argued below
• Mary Carter agreements essentially champertous because settling defendant retains financial interest in plaintiff's success against non-settling defendant
• Mary Carter agreements essentially champertous because settling defendant retains financial interest in plaintiff’s success against non-settling defendant
• counsel acknowledged agreement might prejudice jury because of references to insurance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).