Supreme Court of Florida· 11/8/2012
Lukehart v. State
Citations
- 103 So. 3d 134
- 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 677
- 2012 Fla. LEXIS 2279
- 2012 WL 5439271
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming the denial of Lukehart’s first successive 5. In his initial postconviction proceeding, Lukehart raised the following claims before us: (1) counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge the prior violent felony aggravator during the penalty phase; (2
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Canady, Labarga, Lewis, Pariente, Perry, Polston, Quince
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McLin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-09-12· cited 146×
- State v. ConeySupreme Court of Florida· 2003-03-06· cited 114×
- Foster v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-02-14· cited 73×
- Lukehart v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-09-28· cited 54×
- Lukehart v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2011-06-23· cited 48×
- Jimenez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-12-18· cited 39×
- Rutherford v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-01-27· cited 38×
- Davis v. LuebbersSupreme Court· 2001-06-25· cited 7×
- Lukehart v. FloridaSupreme Court· 2001-06-25· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.