Luis Alberto Olivas v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “‘Employers asserting an exclusion have the burden of proving their employees fit plainly and unmistakably within its terms.’” (quoting Tift v. Pro. Nursing Servs., Inc., 76 Wn. App. 577, 582, 886 P.2d 1158, review denied, 127 Wn.2d 1007 (1995
• “‘Employers asserting an exclusion have the burden of proving their employees fit plainly and unmistakably within its terms.’” (quoting Tift v. Pro. Nursing Servs., Inc., 76 Wn. App. 577, 582, 886 P.2d 1158, review denied, 127 Wn.2d 1007 (1995), review denied, 160 Wn.2d 1016 (2007))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).