Skip to main content

Lugo v. State

Citations

  • 923 S.W.2d 598
  • 1995 WL 488534

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the appellant had not been judicially awarded custody of the child, was not married to the child’s mother, did not have the mother’s consent to take the child, and merely possessed the status of biological father
  • explaining that defendant’s belief that he was parent or relative of child “applies to a 13 portion of the affirmative defense to kidnapping, not to the elements of the underlying offense”
  • “A mistake about the existence of a fact which would establish an affirmative defense to an offense, rather than negating the element of the offense, does not raise the mistake of fact defense.”
  • ignorance of the law is no defense to prosecution
  • ignorance of the law is no defense to prosecution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilson, Cohen and Hedges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.