Skip to main content

Lucas v. Lucas

Citations

  • 869 A.2d 239
  • 88 Conn. App. 246
  • 2005 Conn. App. LEXIS 114

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • motion for modification was pending for purposes of retroactivity when initial motion was undecided and relief sought did not change from initial motion for modification to amended motion for modification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Foti, Flynn, Hennessy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.