Supreme Court of Connecticut· 5/7/1991
Battersby v. Battersby
Citations
- 218 Conn. 467
- 590 A.2d 427
- 1991 Conn. LEXIS 231
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[ajbsent ambiguity, the courts cannot read into statutes, by construction, provisions that are not clearly stated”
- “[a]bsent ambiguity, the courts cannot read into statutes, by construction, provisions that are not clearly stated”
- ‘‘When language used in a statute is clear and unambiguous, its meaning is not subject to modification or construction. . . . Absent ambigu- premises with his consent, in which case such duty shall be the responsibility of the tenant; (3
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Santaniello
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Maturo v. MaturoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-05-04· cited 65×
- Voishan v. PalmaCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-07-22· cited 61×
- Savage v. SavageConnecticut Appellate Court· 1991-09-10· cited 52×
- Florestal v. Government Employees InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-03-19· cited 46×
- Mulholland v. MulhollandSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-06-14· cited 37×
- Carey v. CareyConnecticut Appellate Court· 1992-11-10· cited 33×
- Metro Bulletins Corp. v. SoboleskiConnecticut Appellate Court· 1993-03-02· cited 26×
- Grondin v. CuriSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-03-18· cited 25×
- McDonald v. RoweConnecticut Appellate Court· 1996-09-10· cited 20×
- Lash v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-03-19· cited 19×
- Martone v. MartoneConnecticut Appellate Court· 1992-07-14· cited 16×
- Draper v. DraperConnecticut Appellate Court· 1996-03-12· cited 16×
- Mulholland v. MulhollandConnecticut Appellate Court· 1992-02-11· cited 14×
- Smith v. StewartSupreme Court of Vermont· 1996-08-02· cited 13×
- Lucas v. LucasConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-03-29· cited 12×
- Kupersmith v. KupersmithConnecticut Appellate Court· 2013-09-24· cited 12×
- Foti v. RichardsonConnecticut Appellate Court· 1993-02-23· cited 11×
- Benedetto v. BenedettoConnecticut Appellate Court· 1999-10-19· cited 10×
- Monette v. MonetteConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-06-26· cited 6×
- Rostad v. HirschConnecticut Appellate Court· 2014-03-04· cited 6×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Leo v. LeoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-07-23· cited 174×
- Hayes v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-07-24· cited 132×
- Johnson v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-05-28· cited 131×
- United Aircraft Corporation v. FusariSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1972-07-12· cited 83×
- State v. BakerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-04-02· cited 47×
- Serrano v. SerranoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-11-21· cited 41×
- Cilley v. LamphereSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-01-19· cited 31×
- Lev v. LevConnecticut Appellate Court· 1987-04-28· cited 18×
- Riccio v. RiccioSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1966-01-13· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.