Nevada Supreme Court· 2/16/2001

Lubin v. Kunin

Citations

17 P.3d 422
117 Nev. 107
117 Nev. Adv. Rep. 11
2001 Nev. LEXIS 13

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that whether a statement is defamatory depends on the entirety of the statement and the context of its use
providing that \[Ole common interest privilege is conditional and exists where a defamatory statement is made in good faith\ (emphasis added) (internal quotation marks omitted)
providing that \[Ole common interest privilege is conditional and exists where a defamatory statement is made in good faith\ (emphasis added) (internal quotation marks omitted)
stating that a conditional privilege, the common interest privilege, should not be considered on an NRCP 12(b)(5) motion to dismiss, \but may or may not be applicable to the case when properly raised and fully presented to the district court\
stating that a conditional privilege, the common interest privilege, should not be considered on an NRCP 12(b)(5) motion to dismiss, \but may or may not be applicable to the case when properly raised and fully presented to the district court\
stating that a conditional privilege, the common interest privilege, should not be considered on an NRCP 12(b)(5) motion to dismiss, \but may or may not be applicable to the case when properly raised and fully presented to the district court\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Maupin, Rose, Becker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.