Diamond Enterprises, Inc. v. Lau

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[i]t is well established that arguments raised for the first time on appeal need not be considered by this court”
• “It is well established that arguments raised for the first time on appeal need not be considered by this court.”
• \pit is well established that arguments raised for the first time on appeal need not be considered by this court\
• \It is well established that arguments raised for the first time on appeal need not be considered by this court.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).