Lowrey v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that right to confront was violated where videotape interview of victim was admitted into evidence and defendant was not afforded a meaningful opportunity to cross examine the victim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mitchell Lowery v. James Collins, Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
  Fifth Circuit· 1993-04-07· cited 69×
• Mitchell Lowery v. James Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
  Fifth Circuit· 1993-07-20· cited 42×
• Larry Schaal, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. James A. Gammon, Appellant/cross-Appellee
  Eighth Circuit· 2000-11-14· cited 11×
• State v. Larson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1989-12-12· cited 3×
• State of Washington v. Sean Joseph Bates
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2016-09-22· cited 3×
• Lowrey v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1988-12-06· cited 1×
• Marshall Moreno v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2005-03-10
• Lester Samuel Williams v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2007-08-08
• Larry Schaal v. James Gammon
  Eighth Circuit· 2000-11-14

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Coy v. Iowa
  Supreme Court· 1988-06-29· cited 1,295×
• Long v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-07-01· cited 195×
• Mallory v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-06-15· cited 102×
• Mallory v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1985-11-13· cited 19×