Skip to main content

Loveless v. State

Citations

  • 592 P.2d 1206
  • 1979 Alas. LEXIS 627

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • psychologist's testimony at criminal trial was limited to a description of his observations of defendant at jailhouse interview; the privilege against self-incrimination would require exclusion of statements indicating involvement in crime
  • psychologist’s testimony at criminal trial was limited to a description of his observations of defendant at jailhouse interview; the privilege against self-incrimination would require exclusion of state ments indicating involvement in crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rabinowitz, Boochever, Witz, Connor, Burke, Matthews

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.