Love v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because the procuring agent defense negates an element of the crime, the State is required to disprove agency beyond a reasonable doubt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Adam v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2011-09-22· cited 11×
• Colon v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1997-04-24· cited 11×
• McIntosh v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1997-01-30· cited 9×
• State v. Porter
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1999-10-11· cited 8×
• Dozier v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2008-03-13· cited 5×
• Dent v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1996-12-20· cited 2×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Kelso v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 33×
• Roy v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1971-11-02· cited 26×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1965-11-03· cited 18×
• People v. Arnott
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1988-10-11· cited 17×
• St. Pierre v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1980-12-17· cited 16×
• Hillis v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1987-12-10· cited 16×
• Barone v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1993-08-25· cited 14×
• People v. Matos
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1986-09-08· cited 13×
• Dixon v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1978-09-29· cited 7×
• Buckley v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1979-09-24· cited 7×
• Paul Andre B., a Minor v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1992-05-15· cited 4×
• People v. Tower
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1986-07-11· cited 2×