Lotz v. Com.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the circuit court’s decision to deny Lotz a conditional release because he was physically aggressive and disruptive
• applying this standard on review of a conditional release ruling under the sexually violent predator statutes
• applying a sufficiency of the evidence standard to a sexually violent predator appeal
• considering the merits of appeal challenging order to remain in secure inpatient treatment
• “[C]onditional release is permitted only after a judicial determination that [the respondent] satisfies all four criteria.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).