Skip to main content

Lott v. State

Citations

  • 636 S.E.2d 102
  • 281 Ga. App. 373
  • 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 2812
  • 2006 Ga. App. LEXIS 1106

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the defense of justification is based on a ‘reasonable man’ standard of behavior”
  • because the jury was fairly informed on justification for homicide, there was not “a reasonable probability that the jury would have reached a different result if an instruction on specific forcible felonies had also been given”
  • admissibility of expert testimony is a matter within trial court’s sound discretion
  • no prejudice from trial counsel’s failure to request charge on forcible felonies that might have authorized the defendant’s use of deadly force, because the trial court gave other instructions that informed the jury as to when a homicide is justified
  • no prejudice from trial counsel’s failure to request charge on forcible felonies that might have authorized the defendant’s use of deadly force, because the trial court gave other instructions that informed the jury as to when a homicide is justified

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller, Johnson, Ellington

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.