· 6/20/1984
Losurdo Bros. v. Arkin Distributing Co.
Citations
- 465 N.E.2d 139
- 125 Ill. App. 3d 267
- 80 Ill. Dec. 348
- 1984 Ill. App. LEXIS 1973
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the foundation for an award of attorneys’ fees is the amount of time spent by the lawyer on a case, the lawyer’s ability, and the complexity of the work
- holding objection to variance waived where party introduces evidence rebutting unpleaded allegations
- duplicating expenses, unless they are extraordinary, are normally associated with office overhead expenses and are included within the attorney’s hourly rate
- duplicating expenses, unless they are extraordinary, are normally associated with office overhead expenses and are included within the attorney’s hourly rate
- duplicating expenses, unless they are extraordinary, are normally associated with office overhead expenses and are included within the attorney's hourly rate
- the legal issues “were not complex requiring an attorney with specialized skills to be employed outside the general area of where the lawsuit was filed”; therefore, travel time was appropriately limited to that generally incurred by attorneys in the area of the court proceeding
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reinhard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.