Skip to main content
· 6/20/1984

Losurdo Bros. v. Arkin Distributing Co.

Citations

  • 465 N.E.2d 139
  • 125 Ill. App. 3d 267
  • 80 Ill. Dec. 348
  • 1984 Ill. App. LEXIS 1973

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the foundation for an award of attorneys’ fees is the amount of time spent by the lawyer on a case, the lawyer’s ability, and the complexity of the work
  • holding objection to variance waived where party introduces evidence rebutting unpleaded allegations
  • duplicating expenses, unless they are extraordinary, are normally associated with office overhead expenses and are included within the attorney’s hourly rate
  • duplicating expenses, unless they are extraordinary, are normally associated with office overhead expenses and are included within the attorney’s hourly rate
  • duplicating expenses, unless they are extraordinary, are normally associated with office overhead expenses and are included within the attorney's hourly rate
  • the legal issues “were not complex requiring an attorney with specialized skills to be employed outside the general area of where the lawsuit was filed”; therefore, travel time was appropriately limited to that generally incurred by attorneys in the area of the court proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reinhard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.