Skip to main content

Lorentz v. Dunn

Citations

  • 112 S.W.3d 176
  • 2003 WL 21290886

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that amended pleading did not relate back because plaintiff did not show that she possessed standing when she filed the original pleading
  • recognizing that \This statute [the survival statute] provides a party who would not otherwise have a justiciable claim with standing to sue.\
  • recognizing that “This statute [the survival statute] provides a party who would not otherwise have a justiciable claim with standing to sue.”
  • holding that amended pleading did not relate back because plaintiff did not show that she possessed standing when she filed the original pleading
  • recognizing that “This statute [the survival statute] provides a party who would not otherwise have a justiciable claim with standing to sue.”
  • recognizing that “This statute [the survival statute] provides a party who would not otherwise have a justiciable claim with standing to sue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dauphinot, Day, Livingston

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.