Court of Appeals of Texas· 7/10/2003
Lorentz v. Dunn
Citations
- 112 S.W.3d 176
- 2003 WL 21290886
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that amended pleading did not relate back because plaintiff did not show that she possessed standing when she filed the original pleading
- recognizing that \This statute [the survival statute] provides a party who would not otherwise have a justiciable claim with standing to sue.\
- recognizing that “This statute [the survival statute] provides a party who would not otherwise have a justiciable claim with standing to sue.”
- holding that amended pleading did not relate back because plaintiff did not show that she possessed standing when she filed the original pleading
- recognizing that “This statute [the survival statute] provides a party who would not otherwise have a justiciable claim with standing to sue.”
- recognizing that “This statute [the survival statute] provides a party who would not otherwise have a justiciable claim with standing to sue.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dauphinot, Day, Livingston
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Austin Nursing Center, Inc. v. LovatoTexas Supreme Court· 2005-05-13· cited 699×
- Damian v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2011-08-31· cited 26×
- Pratho v. ZapataCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2005-02-03· cited 25×
- Super Wash, Inc. v. City of White SettlementCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2004-02-26· cited 17×
- Super Wash, Inc. v. City of White SettlementTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2004-02-26
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2005-02-03
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2005-02-03
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2011-08-31
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2011-08-31
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court· 1993-05-05· cited 5,047×
- Ltd. v. Williamson County Appraisal DistrictTexas Supreme Court· 1996-07-12· cited 667×
- Russell v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.Texas Supreme Court· 1992-12-09· cited 259×
- Shepherd v. LedfordTexas Supreme Court· 1998-03-13· cited 241×
- Cadle Co. v. LobingierCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2001-06-21· cited 178×
- Pledger v. SchoellkopfTexas Supreme Court· 1988-12-07· cited 146×
- Bell v. MooresCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1992-06-11· cited 136×
- Stewart v. HardieCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1998-08-06· cited 84×
- Ford Motor Co. v. CammackTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1999-07-15· cited 34×
- McAdams v. Capitol Products Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1991-07-17· cited 33×
- Pankhurst v. Weitinger & TuckerTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1993-04-01· cited 27×
- Goode v. ShoukfehTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 1993-10-04· cited 22×
- Becton Dickinson and Co. v. UsreyCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2001-10-25· cited 21×
- Duncan v. Texas Department of Public SafetyTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 1999-11-23· cited 15×
- Roman Forest Public Utility Dist. No. 4 v. McCorkleTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 1999-10-07· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.