Lord v. Shaw

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that a divorce decree stating “alimony is to run for a period of three years” did “not provide for an exception to the general rule that alimony terminates upon remarriage”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Peterson v. Peterson
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1989-01-11· cited 69×
• Wiese v. Wiese
  Utah Supreme Court· 1985-03-07· cited 33×
• Bailey v. Sound Lab, Inc.
  Utah Supreme Court· 1984-12-21· cited 21×
• Hagan v. Hagan
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1991-04-17· cited 17×
• Jeppson v. Jeppson
  Utah Supreme Court· 1984-06-29· cited 12×
• Dana v. Dana
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1990-03-30· cited 9×
• Walker v. Walker
  Utah Supreme Court· 1985-09-20· cited 2×
• McQuarrie v. McQuarrie
  Utah Supreme Court· 2021-06-17· cited 2×
• McQuarrie v. McQuarrie
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2019-08-29· cited 1×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Stanton v. Stanton
  Supreme Court· 1975-04-15· cited 414×
• Fletcher v. Fletcher
  Utah Supreme Court· 1980-07-18· cited 45×
• Austad v. Austad
  Utah Supreme Court· 1954-04-13· cited 42×
• Turner v. Turner
  Utah Supreme Court· 1982-05-25· cited 38×
• Stanton v. Stanton
  Utah Supreme Court· 1974-01-04· cited 28×
• Nelson v. Stoker
  Utah Supreme Court· 1983-08-01· cited 27×
• Christensen v. Christensen
  Utah Supreme Court· 1981-05-01· cited 19×
• Ferguson v. Ferguson
  Utah Supreme Court· 1977-05-19· cited 16×
• Wood v. Turner
  Utah Supreme Court· 1966-08-10· cited 13×
• Kent v. Kent
  Utah Supreme Court· 1972-05-26· cited 7×
• Openshaw v. Openshaw
  Utah Supreme Court· 1981-12-18· cited 7×