Jeppson v. Jeppson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• including rental income received by the wife for purposes of determining whether termination of alimony was proper

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Stonehocker v. Stonehocker
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2008-01-10· cited 62×
• Porco v. Porco
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1988-04-05· cited 37×
• Throckmorton v. Throckmorton
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1988-12-19· cited 33×
• Petersen v. Petersen
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1987-05-18· cited 30×
• Mineer v. Mineer
  Utah Supreme Court· 1985-09-24· cited 9×
• Dana v. Dana
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1990-03-30· cited 9×
• Kinsman v. Kinsman
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1988-01-12· cited 9×
• Stettler v. Stettler
  Utah Supreme Court· 1985-09-20· cited 8×
• Canning v. Canning
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1987-10-16· cited 6×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Fletcher v. Fletcher
  Utah Supreme Court· 1980-07-18· cited 45×
• Turner v. Turner
  Utah Supreme Court· 1982-05-25· cited 38×
• Higley v. Higley
  Utah Supreme Court· 1983-12-19· cited 27×
• Haslam v. Haslam
  Utah Supreme Court· 1982-12-31· cited 21×
• Gramme v. Gramme
  Utah Supreme Court· 1978-11-14· cited 19×
• Christensen v. Christensen
  Utah Supreme Court· 1981-05-01· cited 19×
• Lord v. Shaw
  Utah Supreme Court· 1984-05-01· cited 12×
• Sorensen v. Sorensen
  Utah Supreme Court· 1968-02-29· cited 9×
• Christiansen v. Christiansen
  Utah Supreme Court· 1983-06-23· cited 8×
• Openshaw v. Openshaw
  Utah Supreme Court· 1981-12-18· cited 7×