New Mexico Supreme Court· 11/29/1932
Lord v. Lord
Citations
- 16 P.2d 933
- 37 N.M. 24
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the fact that the former wife’s father supported her may be considered in awarding or modifying alimony, but not in this case
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Watson, Bickley, Sadler, Hudspeth, Neal
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- DeTevis v. AragonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1986-10-09· cited 47×
- Tuttle v. TuttleNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1959-08-31· cited 24×
- Kerley v. KerleyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1961-11-07· cited 15×
- McClure v. McClureNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1976-08-13· cited 9×
- Lewis v. LewisIdaho Supreme Court· 1952-10-07· cited 2×
- Parker v. ParkerNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1979-05-14· cited 1×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ruge v. RugeWashington Supreme Court· 1917-06-19· cited 59×
- Herrett v. HerrettWashington Supreme Court· 1914-07-22· cited 17×
- Weld v. WeldSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1881-05-16· cited 11×
- Boniface v. BonifaceSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1929-06-10· cited 9×
- Hodges v. HodgesNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1916-09-05· cited 9×
- Oldham v. OldhamNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1922-07-28· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.