Hodges v. Hodges
Citations
- 22 N.M. 192
- 159 P. 1007
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Findings of fact by tbe trial court, when supported by . substantial evidence, will not be disturbed in this court.</p> <p>P. 194</p> <p>2. Although a finding that the wife was the sole owner of furniture and household goods might not be strictly correct under the proofs, where the court has power to award a division of the common property, such error, if error it was, is not available to the husband.</p> <p>P. 195</p> <p>3. A motion to reopen a case for further proofs is addressed to the sound discretion of the court, which discretion will not ordinarily he reviewed.</p> <p>P. 195</p> <p>4. The ecclesiastical law of England in' regard to marriage and divorce has never been adopted in its entirety in America. Only such portions thereof as have been formulated into statutes have been adopted, and such statutes form the sole basis of jurisdiction of the courts in this state. There is no power vested by statute in the courts of this state to award a limited divorce, or a legal separation, and hence no such power exists.</p> <p>P. 195</p>
Judges: Hanna, Parker, Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. CarabajalNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1920-10-05· cited 39×
- State v. NevaresNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1932-01-27· cited 30×
- Chavez v. ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1935-10-09· cited 26×
- Gilmore v. GilmoreNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1988-01-19· cited 11×
- Lord v. LordNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1932-11-29· cited 9×
- Ex Parte SedilloNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1929-05-07· cited 6×
- State v. FosterNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1922-09-29· cited 6×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Perky v. PerryNew York Court of Chancery· 1831-07-19· cited 44×
- Hopkins v. HopkinsWisconsin Supreme Court· 1875-08-15· cited 21×
- Brusie v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1889-09-10· cited 19×
- Williamson v. WilliamsonNew York Court of Chancery· 1815-07-17· cited 19×
- State ex rel. Hagert v. TempletonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1909-11-16· cited 17×
- Hagle v. HagleCalifornia Supreme Court· 1888-01-28· cited 15×
- Kenyon v. KenyonUtah Supreme Court· 1861-01-29· cited 4×
- Patton v. PattonNew York Supreme Court· 1910-05-15· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.