Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1/14/1980
Lopez v. Lopez
Citations
- 609 P.2d 579
- 125 Ariz. 309
- 1980 Ariz. App. LEXIS 409
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The intention of the court must be determined from all parts of the judgment . . . .” (citations omitted)
- retirement Social Security payments received by wife and children to be credited against husband’s support obligations
- “The intention of the court must be determined from all parts of the judgment.”
- “The intention of the court must be determined from all parts of the judgment and words and clauses should be construed according to their natural and legal import.”
- “The intention of the court must be determined from all parts of the judgment and words and clauses should be construed according to their natural and legal import.”
- in action for child support arrearages, burden is on obligor to show payment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Howard, Hathaway, Richmond
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Cohen v. FreyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-05-09· cited 58×
- In Re Marriage of HenryIllinois Supreme Court· 1993-10-21· cited 57×
- Ahuna v. Department of Hawaiian Home LandsHawaii Supreme Court· 1982-03-16· cited 47×
- Pontbriand v. PontbriandSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1993-03-29· cited 33×
- In re the Marriage of JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-12-19· cited 31×
- Commonwealth v. VogelsongSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-03-11· cited 30×
- Motzer v. EscalanteCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2011-11-22· cited 19×
- Farley v. FarleyWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1991-12-12· cited 18×
- Matter of Estate of PattersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-01-29· cited 13×
- Kent v. Carter-KentCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-07-29· cited 12×
- Wooten v. WootenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-07-24· cited 10×
- Clark v. ClarkHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2006-04-19· cited 8×
- In Re the Marriage of BelgerSupreme Court of Iowa· 2002-12-18· cited 7×
- Roberts v. RobertsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1997-06-25· cited 7×
- State Ex Rel. Pfister Ex Rel. Pfister v. LarsonCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 1997-06-26· cited 6×
- Graby v. GrabyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1994-02-04· cited 5×
- In re the Marriage of MartinCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2004-08-13· cited 2×
- Phillips v. PhillipsWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1991-03-28· cited 2×
- Shaw v. QuaintanceCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-01-29· cited 1×
- Todd v. NormanEighth Circuit· 1988-05-20
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cash v. CashSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1962-02-05· cited 62×
- McClaskey v. McClaskeyMissouri Court of Appeals· 1976-11-16· cited 36×
- Baures v. BauresCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1970-12-22· cited 26×
- Badertscher v. BadertscherCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1969-10-24· cited 20×
- Cole v. ColeArizona Supreme Court· 1966-11-17· cited 15×
- Chudzinski v. ChudzinskiCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-03-09· cited 15×
- Keiser v. WiedmerMissouri Court of Appeals· 1955-11-15· cited 15×
- Goeller v. GoellerMissouri Court of Appeals· 1961-05-16· cited 7×
- McConnell v. TheriotLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1974-07-01· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.