Skip to main content
· 7/29/2014

Kent v. Carter-Kent

Citations

  • 235 Ariz. 309
  • 332 P.3d 56
  • 692 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 40
  • 2014 WL 3879430
  • 2014 Ariz. App. LEXIS 135

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a party could not raise a new issue in its motion for a new trial
  • ex-wife could not use motion for new trial as a vehicle for a revaluation of ex-husband’s firm, when remedy was not at issue in the underlying order
  • party waives issues raised for first time in motion for new trial
  • motion for new trial reviewed for an abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson, Gould, Swann

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.