Nevada Supreme Court· 10/19/1983
Longoria v. State
Citations
- 670 P.2d 939
- 99 Nev. 754
- 1983 Nev. LEXIS 534
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that both defendant's planning activity and the manner of killing as it bears upon a pre-existing reflection to take the victim's life in a particular way are relevant to premeditation and deliberation
- holding that both defendant’s planning activity and the manner of killing as it bears upon a preexisting reflection to take the victim’s life in a particular way are relevant to premeditation and deliberation
- holding the prosecutor improperly questioned the defendant about a prior, unrelated incident because the evidence principally demonstrated the defendant's bad character
- holding the prosecutor improperly questioned the defendant about a prior, unrelated incident where the defendant was arrested for attempting to kill someone, because the evidence principally demonstrated the defendant's bad character
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Masters v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2002-10-15· cited 936×
- Bouwkamp v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1992-06-02· cited 67×
- Fields v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2009-12-10· cited 21×
- Hightower v. State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court· 1995-08-21· cited 16×
- Thompson v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1986-07-08· cited 12×
- RANDOLPH (THOMAS) VS. STATE (DEATH PENALTY-DIRECT)Nevada Supreme Court· 2020-12-10· cited 5×
- Honkanen v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1989-12-29· cited 3×
- State v. McAnultyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-09-14· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.