Skip to main content

Longoria v. State

Citations

  • 148 S.W.3d 657
  • 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 9179
  • 2004 WL 2340284

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that consequential facts are those “which have something to do with the ultimate determination of guilt or innocence in a particular case”
  • holding counsel’s failure to object to victim-impact testimony did not fall below objective standard of reasonableness because testimony regarding complainants’ behavior had tendency to make more or less probable a fact of consequence at guilt phase of trial
  • testimony that two juvenile victims’ “[Bjehavior and long-term prognosis would have a tendency to make more or less probable a fact of consequence at the guilt stage; that is, whether appellant committed the crimes at all.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adele Hedges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.