Trimble v. Pracna

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “although a party should be fully compensated for its loss, it should not recover a windfall”
• ‘‘[the] intent of the parties ... is determined based on the contract alone unless the contract is ambiguous”
• Plaintiff could present multiple theories of recovery so long as they were not factually inconsistent, but instead merely included damages that could be overlapped.
• \Whether to give a withdrawal instruction is a matter within the discretion of the trial court.\
• “The reliance must be proven to be reasonable.”
• reversing denial of JNOV on fraud

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).