E.D. New York· 6/22/2006
Lonegan v. Hasty
Citations
- 436 F. Supp. 2d 419
- 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41807
- 2006 WL 1707258
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, under precedent such as Katz, prison officials were not entitled to qualified immunity with respect to their actions in recording attorney-client conversations
- concluding that § 2520 permits suits based on procurement
- concluding that § 2520 permits suits based on procurement
- concluding that § 2520 permits suits based on procurement
- concluding that § 2520 permits suits based on procurement
- concluding that § 2520 permits suits based on procurement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gershon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Sandoval v. American Building Maintenance Industries, Inc.D. Minnesota· 2007-10-23· cited 27×
- Council on American-Islamic Relations Action Network, Inc. v. GaubatzDistrict of Columbia· 2012-09-17· cited 24×
- Turkmen v. AshcroftE.D. New York· 2013-01-15· cited 15×
- Kirch v. Embarq Management Co.Tenth Circuit· 2012-12-28· cited 13×
- In re Trilegiant Corp.D. Connecticut· 2014-03-28· cited 8×
- Hill v. DonoghueE.D. New York· 2011-09-02· cited 5×
- Gennusa v. ShoarM.D. Florida· 2012-07-17· cited 5×
- Shefts v. PetrakisC.D. Illinois· 2013-06-21· cited 5×
- Sharyl Attkisson v. Eric Holder, Jr.Fourth Circuit· 2019-03-21· cited 2×
Cites
42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 22,846×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court· 1985-06-19· cited 8,858×
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court· 2002-02-26· cited 8,748×
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court· 1984-07-03· cited 8,014×
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court· 1998-05-26· cited 6,212×
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court· 1984-05-22· cited 5,292×
- Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court· 2002-06-27· cited 4,957×
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Second Circuit· 2002-02-21· cited 4,118×
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1981-01-13· cited 3,227×
- United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of MichiganSupreme Court· 1972-06-19· cited 1,683×
- Groh v. RamirezSupreme Court· 2004-02-24· cited 1,303×
- Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 1,212×
- Conn v. GabbertSupreme Court· 1999-04-05· cited 836×
- Ryder Energy Distribution Corporation v. Merrill Lynch Commodities Inc., E.F. Hutton & Co., Inc., and New York Mercantile ExchangeSecond Circuit· 1984-11-15· cited 571×
- Swidler & Berlin v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1998-06-25· cited 387×
- Lanza v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1962-06-04· cited 368×
- Cooper v. ParskySecond Circuit· 1998-04-02· cited 340×
- Phelps v. KapnolasSecond Circuit· 2002-10-17· cited 326×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.