Lomont v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying same reasoning to lack of forensic diversion program in county in which defendant committed crime
• rejecting defendant’s privileges-and- immunities claim because, while other counties may offer diversion programs, he was treated no differently than other similarly situated offenders in his county
• “[Committing a crime contemplated by the forensic diversion program statute in a smaller county or one with limited financial resources as compared to committing such a crime in a large or resource-rich county is not a classification for equal protection purposes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jason E. Morales v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2013-07-25· cited 2×
• Thomas J Herr v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2023-06-29

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Collins v. Day
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1994-11-28· cited 285×
• State v. Harner
  Washington Supreme Court· 2005-02-17· cited 32×
• State v. Harner
  Washington Supreme Court· 2004-12-23· cited 32×
• Bennett v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2003-12-08· cited 22×
• Griffin v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1984-04-19· cited 21×
• Minton v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2004-01-29· cited 15×
• State v. Little
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2003-04-01· cited 11×
• Shepperson v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2003-12-22· cited 6×
• Ruble v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2006-08-24· cited 2×