Lois Ann Singer v. Pierce & Associates, P.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that no § 1692e or § 1692f violation occurred where debt collector segregated attorney’s fees from the underlying debt in an itemized list of expenses
• explaining that Fields “hold[s] that it is misleading under the FDCPA to lump attorneys’ fees in with the principal debt as part of an account balance in a dunning letter”
• where a debt collector itemizes or segregates the court costs or attorney fees in the collection letter, there is no FDCPA violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).