Flentye v. Kathrein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying a motion to dismiss an intentional infliction of emotional distress claim premised on allegedly defamatory statements that included “assertions of a sexually repugnant nature”
• declining to consider defendant’s offer of webpages with disclaimers that contradicted allegations in complaint because there was no indication the printouts were the entirety of site, and discovery required to authenticate documents and eliminate any ambiguity
• “[Defendant] argues that to the extent the alleged alter ego relationship is premised on fraud, Plaintiffs must satisfy Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b
• “Under Illinois law, defamatory statements, if sufficiently extreme and outrageous, can support an IIED claim.”
• plaintiffs can “easily satisf[y]” the bad faith element “by explicitly alleging that Defendants registered the domain names in bad faith”
• “The defense of laches generally requires a fact-intensive inquiry... it is usually not amenable to being resolved on summary judgment, let alone on a motion to dismiss”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).