Skip to main content
· 7/23/2009

Lohman v. Duryea Borough

Citations

  • 574 F.3d 163
  • 29 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 954
  • 186 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3070
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 16245
  • 92 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,622
  • 2009 WL 2183056

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that rejection of a settlement offer six times the jury award was probative of the plaintiffs lack of success
  • acknowledging that settlement offers are “clearly only one factor to be considered in the award of fees,” and that the district court “is also free to reject such evidence as not bearing on success”
  • “[W]e hold only that settlement negotiations may be relevant in measuring success, and, if so, are clearly only one factor to be considered in the award of fees.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rendell, Garth, Padova

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.