Ingram v. Oroudjian

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court may rely on its own familiarity 21 with the local legal market to evaluate and set a reasonable hourly rate
• holding that the district court did not err by considering settlement negotiations for the purpose of deciding a reasonable attorney's fees award
• holding that “judges are 22 justified in relying on their own knowledge of customary rates and their experience 23 concerning reasonable and proper fees”
• holding that “judges are justified in relying on their own knowledge of 7 customary rates and their experience concerning reasonable and proper fees”
• holding that “judges are justified in relying on their own knowledge of 15 customary rates and their experience concerning reasonable and proper fees”
• holding that settlement negotiations probative of a plaintiff’s success can be admitted for the purpose of deciding a reasonable attorney fee award

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).