Lohan v. Perez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that use of plaintiff’s name in song did not violate privacy law
• fining counsel for filing an opposition brief that was taken from unidentified, unattributed sources
• describing a document as \integral to the complaint\ where \it is a document upon which the complaint solely relies ... or where the complaint relies heavily upon its terms and effects\
• levied a $750.00 fine for attorney’s plagiarism in opposition briefing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Michael Davis v. Electronic Arts Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2015-01-06· cited 22×
• Lohan v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
  Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors· 2018-03-29· cited 18×
• Liberty Towers Realty, LLC v. Richmond Liberty, LLC
  E.D. New York· 2017-06-20· cited 8×
• Somerset v. Stephen Einstein & Assocs., P.C.
  E.D. New York· 2019-01-04· cited 4×
• Khozissova v. Ralph Lauren Corp.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2024-06-18