Michael Davis v. Electronic Arts Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• exercising the Court’s discretion to determine whether plaintiffs’ state law claims are barred by the incidental use defense not asserted in the district court
• “Although 10 California courts have not yet held that the incidental use defense applies to right-of- 11 publicity claims, the defense is widely recognized.”
• “Although 28 California courts have not yet held that the incidental use defense applies to right-of- 1 publicity claims, the defense is widely recognized.”
• analyzing “incidental use” under the 2 First Amendment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).