Ninth Circuit· 1/6/2015
Michael Davis v. Electronic Arts Inc.
Citations
- 775 F.3d 1172
- 43 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1073
- 113 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1341
- 2015 WL 66510
- 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 154
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- exercising the Court’s discretion to determine whether plaintiffs’ state law claims are barred by the incidental use defense not asserted in the district court
- “Although 10 California courts have not yet held that the incidental use defense applies to right-of- 11 publicity claims, the defense is widely recognized.”
- “Although 28 California courts have not yet held that the incidental use defense applies to right-of- 1 publicity claims, the defense is widely recognized.”
- analyzing “incidental use” under the 2 First Amendment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reinhardt, Fisher, Berzon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Sgt. Jeffrey Sarver v. Nicolas ChartierNinth Circuit· 2016-02-17· cited 45×
- United States v. Jorge Alberto NavarroNinth Circuit· 2015-09-04· cited 43×
- C.W. Ex Rel. K.S. v. Capistrano Unified School DistrictNinth Circuit· 2015-03-02· cited 38×
- De Havilland v. FX Networks, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2018-03-26· cited 29×
- Comcast of Sacramento I, LLC v. Sacramento Metropolitan CableNinth Circuit· 2019-05-08· cited 15×
- Daniels v. Fanduel, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2018-03-07· cited 10×
- Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. v. Center for Medical ProgressN.D. California· 2016-09-30· cited 9×
- C. W. v. Capistrano UsdNinth Circuit· 2015-04-09
- Akeem Daniels v. Fanduel, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2018-03-07
- De Havilland v. FX Networks, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2018-03-26
- Richard Dent v. NflNinth Circuit· 2020-08-07
- Banks v. HoffmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2023-09-07
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miller v. GammieNinth Circuit· 2003-07-09· cited 1,582×
- Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Assn.Supreme Court· 2011-06-27· cited 599×
- Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court· 1994-01-28· cited 539×
- Joseph R. Bolker v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueNinth Circuit· 1985-05-17· cited 408×
- Wilson v. Parker, Covert & ChidesterCalifornia Supreme Court· 2002-08-01· cited 405×
- Linder v. Thrifty Oil Co.California Supreme Court· 2000-08-09· cited 361×
- Archdiocese of Milwaukee Supporting Fund, Inc. v. Mercury Interactive Corp.Ninth Circuit· 2010-08-18· cited 341×
- Ginger Rogers v. Alberto Grimaldi, Mgm/ua Entertainment Co., and Pea Produzioni Europee Associate, S.R.L.Second Circuit· 1989-05-05· cited 311×
- Peregrine Funding, Inc. v. Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2005-10-19· cited 232×
- Hilton v. Hallmark CardsNinth Circuit· 2010-03-23· cited 143×
- Bosley Medical Institute, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and Bosley Medical Group, S.C., an Illinois Corporation v. Michael Steven KremerNinth Circuit· 2005-04-04· cited 134×
- Comedy III Productions, Inc. v. Gary Saderup, Inc.California Supreme Court· 2001-04-30· cited 113×
- Mindys Cosmetics, Inc. v. DakarNinth Circuit· 2010-07-06· cited 102×
- Montana v. San Jose Mercury News, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1995-05-03· cited 54×
- Premier Medical Management Systems, Inc. v. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2006-02-06· cited 54×
- Hart v. Electronic Arts, Inc.Third Circuit· 2013-05-21· cited 49×
- Gionfriddo v. Major League BaseballCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2001-12-10· cited 48×
- Dora v. Frontline Video, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1993-04-30· cited 44×
- Samuel Keller v. Electronic Arts Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2013-07-31· cited 38×
- Doubt v. Activision Publishing, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2011-02-15· cited 37×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.