Logan v. Logan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the former husband failed to show the required prejudice where he did not testify that he would have acted differently during the period of delay if he had known the former wife would assert the children’s right to child support

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Department of Revenue ex rel. Thorman v. Holley
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-05-01· cited 12×
• Fludd v. Kirkwood
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2021-12-16· cited 1×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McCray v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-10-09· cited 90×
• Ticktin v. Kearin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-10-24· cited 19×
• Brumby v. Brumby
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-12-21· cited 16×
• Dean v. Dean
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-01-17· cited 16×
• Popper v. Popper
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-02-07· cited 15×
• Frazier v. Frazier
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-04-02· cited 11×
• State, Department of Revenue ex rel. Dees v. Petro
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-08-01· cited 10×
• Garcia v. Guerra
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-07-28· cited 8×
• Gardiner v. Gardiner
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-02-06· cited 7×
• Bishop v. Bishop
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-11-14· cited 7×
• Department of Revenue v. Steinle
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-02-05· cited 5×
• Edwards v. Edwards
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-01-20· cited 5×
• Gaines v. Gaines
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-03-03· cited 2×
• Florida Dept. of Revenue v. Grant
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-10-26· cited 2×