Skip to main content

Frazier v. Frazier

Citations

  • 616 So. 2d 575
  • 1993 WL 95551

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding also that equitable proceedings to enforce alimony and child support orders are not barred by a statute of limitations
  • holding that “due process requires ... an evidentiary hearing on the disputed factual issues relating to the amount of unpaid alimony and child support” in an action to register a foreign judgment under the Revised Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act
  • noting courts have decided that periodic alimony and child support do not have a legal counterpart for purposes of statutory laches
  • legal statute of limitations would not apply to URESA proceeding to collect delinquent periodic alimony and child support

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Altenbernd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.