Loftis v. Loftis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The appellate courts of this state have said many times that ordinarily a party may not receive relief not contemplated in his pleadings.\
• although Family Court Rule 12 requires pleadings to be liberally construed in family court, this rule cannot be expanded to permit the award of relief not contemplated by the pleadings or the evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Heins v. Heins
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-01-08· cited 47×
• Henry v. Henry
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-08-29· cited 5×
• Richardson v. Richardson
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1992-06-08· cited 3×
• Crawford v. Crawford
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-04-15· cited 3×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Estes v. Estes
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1941-04-18· cited 30×
• Bass v. Bass
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1978-12-06· cited 24×
• Glass v. Glass
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-08-06· cited 20×
• Bank of Augusta v. Satcher Motor Co.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1967-01-12· cited 14×
• Crocker v. Crocker
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-03-19· cited 10×
• Bolding v. Bolding
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-11-26· cited 9×
• Bryan v. Bryan
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-08-17· cited 5×