District of Columbia· 3/3/1969
Lockwood v. Bowles
Citations
- 46 F.R.D. 625
- 13 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1299
- 1969 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13523
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[W]e believe the better view to be that where the court or its officers are not involved, there is no fraud upon the court within the meaning of Rule 60(b).”
- “[I]n order to set aside a judgment . . . because of fraud upon the court . . . it is necessary to show an unconscionable plan or scheme which is designed to improperly influence the court in its decision.” (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robinson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Martha Ann Brundage Rozier v. Ford Motor CompanyFifth Circuit· 1978-07-31· cited 451×
- Valerio v. Boise Cascade Corp.N.D. California· 1978-04-06· cited 130×
- Herring v. United StatesThird Circuit· 2005-09-22· cited 73×
- Sahin v. SahinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2001-11-21· cited 68×
- In the Matter of Whitney-Forbes, Inc., an Illinois Corporation, Debtor. Appeal of David Coar, as Successor to Avrum Dannen, TrusteeSeventh Circuit· 1985-08-16· cited 55×
- United States v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.D. Connecticut· 1972-09-06· cited 51×
- Paternity of CherylMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2001-04-24· cited 48×
- Tri-Cran, Inc. v. Fallon (In Re Tri-Cran, Inc.)D. Massachusetts· 1989-03-17· cited 40×
- Pina v. McGill Development Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1983-02-14· cited 40×
- Winthrop Corp. v. LowenthalMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1990-08-28· cited 36×
- Unnamed caseFourth Circuit· 1982-04-12· cited 35×
- Allen v. BussellAlaska Supreme Court· 1976-12-29· cited 34×
- Synanon Church v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 1984-03-08· cited 33×
- Cvitanovich-Dubie v. DubieHawaii Supreme Court· 2011-06-22· cited 32×
- Gifford v. BowlingSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1972-09-06· cited 31×
- Kelley v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2000-08-03· cited 30×
- Wojcicki v. CaragherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2006-07-11· cited 30×
- Wooster v. WoosterSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1987-01-07· cited 28×
- State v. Alaska Continental Development Corp.Alaska Supreme Court· 1980-12-31· cited 26×
- Mr. G v. Mrs. GCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-10-30· cited 26×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1950-12-11· cited 1,471×
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court· 1944-05-15· cited 1,010×
- A. P. Smith Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-01-09· cited 197×
- William H. Kenner and Eleanor v. Kenner v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSeventh Circuit· 1968-02-27· cited 126×
- John O. England, Trustee of the Estate of Irene Mansfeldt, Bankrupt v. Morgan J. DoyleNinth Circuit· 1960-08-11· cited 114×
- Root Refining Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Third Circuit· 1948-07-06· cited 106×
- Abraham v. OrdwaySupreme Court· 1895-05-20· cited 74×
- The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, a Corporation v. Porter BarrettNinth Circuit· 1957-08-06· cited 72×
- Martina Theatre Corporation v. Schine Chain Theatres, Inc.Second Circuit· 1960-05-13· cited 70×
- Swalley v. Addressograph-Multigraph Corp.Supreme Court· 1949-01-17· cited 44×
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. AbbottFourth Circuit· 1942-08-18· cited 43×
- Dowdy v. Hawfield. Dowdy v. HawfieldD.C. Circuit· 1951-03-01· cited 29×
- Winchester Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1939-12-18· cited 29×
- Universal Oil Products Co. v. William Whitman Co.Supreme Court· 1949-01-17· cited 27×
- Dausuel v. DausuelD.C. Circuit· 1952-03-13· cited 18×
- Peacock Records, Inc. v. Checker Records, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1966-07-26· cited 16×
- Art Metal Works, Inc. v. Abraham & Straus, Inc.Second Circuit· 1939-11-20· cited 14×
- Jungersen v. Axel Bros.S.D. New York· 1954-03-31· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.