Washington Supreme Court· 4/19/2018
Lockner v. Pierce Cnty.
Citations
- 415 P.3d 246
- 190 Wash. 2d 526
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting disputed issues of fact as to whether the I-90 trail “could be used for recreation”
- “Whether land has been opened for recreation is to be viewed from the objective standpoint of the landowner.”
- Immunity does not turn on whether the landowner’s recreational purpose is “‘primary,’” “‘secondary,’” or “incidental.”
- test is whether the land was open for recreation “at all”
- statements made on website and by park officials
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: González, Madsen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Port Of Tacoma, V. Joel Sacks, Dept. Of L & ICourt of Appeals of Washington· 2021-09-21· cited 4×
- State v. Econ. Dev. Bd. for Tacoma-Pierce Cnty.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2019-05-21· cited 4×
- State Of Washington, V Economic Development Board Of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2019-05-21
- Friends Of Clark County And Futurewise, V Clark CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2019-08-20
- Carl W. Schwartz v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2020-10-27
- Schwartz v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court· 2022-09-01
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court· 2002-03-28· cited 1,615×
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court· 2002-03-28· cited 1,608×
- Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1989-03-30· cited 914×
- State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court· 2003-05-22· cited 558×
- State v. KellerWashington Supreme Court· 2001-03-22· cited 194×
- Kilian v. AtkinsonWashington Supreme Court· 2002-08-01· cited 177×
- City of Federal Way v. KoenigWashington Supreme Court· 2009-10-15· cited 85×
- State v. McDougalWashington Supreme Court· 1992-12-10· cited 82×
- Camicia v. Howard S. Wright Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court· 2014-01-30· cited 64×
- Gaeta v. Seattle City LightCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1989-06-26· cited 46×
- State v. DuncanWashington Supreme Court· 2016-04-28· cited 41×
- State v. CooperWashington Supreme Court· 2006-02-23· cited 37×
- Tennyson v. Plum Creek Timber Co.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1994-04-04· cited 35×
- McCarver v. Manson Park and Recreation DistrictWashington Supreme Court· 1979-07-26· cited 34×
- Riksem v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-02-23· cited 30×
- Campbell v. Ticor Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court· 2009-06-18· cited 29×
- Frances Howard v. United States of America Us Sailing Association, Inc. Waikiki Yacht Club, a Hawaii Corporation Guy S. FlemingNinth Circuit· 1999-06-22· cited 28×
- Campbell v. Ticor Title Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court· 2009-06-18· cited 24×
- Davis v. StateWashington Supreme Court· 2001-09-06· cited 21×
- Widman v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-03-29· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.