Skip to main content
· 3/29/1996

Widman v. Johnson

Citations

  • 912 P.2d 1095
  • 81 Wash. App. 110

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that when every reasonable person would believe the landowner opened the property for recreational use the fact that itcould serve other purposes lacks legal significance
  • road used for logging and recreation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Morgan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.