District Court of Appeal of Florida· 10/13/2010
L.O. v. State
Citations
- 44 So. 3d 1290
- 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15552
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that BOLO description of two black males, one wearing a black shirt and black pants and one wearing a red shirt and black pants, did not provide the requisite founded suspicion for the'juvenile’s detention
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ciklin, Hazouri, Taylor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Jonavon D. Gaines v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-02-11· cited 11×
- Sanchez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-08-31· cited 7×
- Torres v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-11-09
- ROD LEE BRUCE v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-05-15
- R.M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-01-02
- State of Florida v. L. C.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-10-16
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Popple v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-10-14· cited 417×
- Hunter v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1995-06-01· cited 175×
- State v. StevensDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-02-07· cited 168×
- Lachs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-01-31· cited 25×
- Romero v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-04-27· cited 20×
- State v. WiseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-07-24· cited 16×
- S.N.J. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-09-18· cited 12×
- Peacock v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-11-25· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.