· 3/4/2010
LLOYD'S, INC. v. Lloyd
Citations
- 693 S.E.2d 451
- 225 W. Va. 377
- 2010 W. Va. LEXIS 10
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding res judicata barred subsequent action although “not identical to the cause of action determined in the previous civil action[]” because the claim could have been resolved in previous action
- finding circuit court did not abuse discretion when denying motion to amend complaint because claims sought to be asserted would have been barred by res judicata, thus amendment would not have permitted presentation of case on merits
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.