Skip to main content
· 3/4/2010

LLOYD'S, INC. v. Lloyd

Citations

  • 693 S.E.2d 451
  • 225 W. Va. 377
  • 2010 W. Va. LEXIS 10

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding res judicata barred subsequent action although “not identical to the cause of action determined in the previous civil action[]” because the claim could have been resolved in previous action
  • finding circuit court did not abuse discretion when denying motion to amend complaint because claims sought to be asserted would have been barred by res judicata, thus amendment would not have permitted presentation of case on merits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.