Lloyd v. Thornsbery
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 239
Syllabus
CIVIL - For cases filed in Ohio state courts, the Ohio.R.Civ.Pro. Apply, not the FRCP Supreme Court of Ohio's Guidelines for Assignments of Judges have not been adopted as rules pursuant to Article IV, Section 5 of the Ohio Constitution and are not binding on Ohio courts the Rules of Superintendence are not the equivalent of rules of procedure and have no force equivalent to a statute appellate courts lack jurisdiction to review the appointment of a visiting judge so appointed by the Supreme Court of Ohio failure to abide by trial court's local rules regarding attorney's withdrawal did not merit reversal where appellant acknowledges notice of intent to withdraw was sent to her via email appellant in a civil case generally has no right to the appointment of counsel unsolicited emails from appellant to opposing counsel's firm relating to an unrelated case did not create a conflict of interest with opposing counsel's representation of defendant-appellees appeal is not the appropriate vehicle for an alleged violation of R.C.149.43 trial court did not err in granting directed verdict for several defendants when no allegations of their wrong-doing, or even their names, were presented in plaintiff's opening statements there is generally no constitutional right to discovery plaintiff was not entitled to additional discovery time-extensions when neither she nor her attorney pursued the request for over two years trial court did not err in limiting opening statements to 20 minutes when counsel agreed, denied needing additional time, and time limit was applied equally to all parties testimony of plaintiff's doctor from another unrelated case was inadmissible hearsay trial court's jury instructions were not erroneous for failing to include a separate instruction on destruction of timber and \willful and wanton conduct\ where these claims were included in other instructions appellant may not raise issues of summary judgment on appeal when she did not move for summary judgment be
Judges: Rice
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. MaurerOhio Supreme Court· 1984-12-20· cited 1,623×
- Goldfuss v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 1,335×
- Nolan v. NolanOhio Supreme Court· 1984-05-02· cited 893×
- Stores Realty Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court· 1975-01-29· cited 458×
- DeHart v. Aetna Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court· 1982-02-10· cited 198×
- Groob v. KeyBankOhio Supreme Court· 2006-03-29· cited 177×
- Midland Steel Products Co. v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers, Local 486Ohio Supreme Court· 1991-07-10· cited 161×
- State ex rel. Lindenschmidt v. Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court· 1995-07-05· cited 139×
- Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Astorhurst Land Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 1985-07-24· cited 101×
- Brinkmoeller v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court· 1975-03-26· cited 70×
- Orbit Electronics, Inc. v. Helm Instrument Co.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2006-05-11· cited 45×
- Morgan v. North Coast Cable Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 1992-03-11· cited 44×
- Parrish v. JonesOhio Supreme Court· 2013-12-04· cited 36×
- State ex rel. Slagle v. RogersOhio Supreme Court· 2004-09-08· cited 20×
- Phillips v. Ingersoll-Humphryes DivisionOhio Supreme Court· 1972-12-15· cited 15×
- Sericola v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-03-21· cited 9×
- Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. SoppOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-03-31· cited 9×
- Hicks v. GarrettOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-08-06· cited 8×
- Habo v. KhattabOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-12-31· cited 8×
- Brannon v. Austinburg Rehabilitation & Nursing CenterOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-11-05· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.