Liu Jin Lin v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing the BIA reviews de novo IJ’s determination as to persecution but, nevertheless, reviewing under “deferential substantial evidence standard” “the BIA’s rulings on this question”
• finding no substantial prejudice where district court instructed jury that it could “only consider” what was “admitted into evidence at trial and that the arguments of counsel were not evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).