Hui Lin Huang v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[a] determination of what will occur in the future and the degree of likelihood of the occurrence has been regularly regarded as fact-finding”
• holding that “[a] 6 1 determination of what will occur in the future and the degree of likelihood of the 2 occurrence has been regularly regarded as fact-finding”
• holding that “de novo review 3 applies to the ultimate question of whether the applicant has 4 sustained her burden to establish that her subjective fear of 5 persecution is objectively reasonable”
• stating that de novo review is properly applied to an Immigration Judge’s determination that an asylum applicant has not satisfied the burden to establish an objectively reasonable fear of persecution
• explaining that “[a] determination of what will occur in the future and the degree of likelihood of the occurrence has been regularly regarded as fact-finding”
• holding the BIA's failure to apply clear- error review is a question of law for which § 1252 provides jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).