Litvinov v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining an applicant who does not show past persecution must prove a well-founded fear of persecution that is both subjectively genuine and objectively reasonable
• affirming adverse credibility determination where the applicant’s testimony “did not match the . . . testimony of other witnesses”
• this court defers to IJ’s credibility determination where it is supported by specific, cogent reasons for disbelief
• asylum eligibility requirements; if asylum applicants do not establish past persecution, they must show fear of future persecution is both subjectively genuine and objectively reasonable
• petitioners provided unpersuasive justifications accounting for discrepancies between asylum application and testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).