Nuga Ivo Nyama v. John Ashcroft

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating the IJ did not err in demanding additional corroborating evidence where the petitioner’s asylum narrative was not credible
• stating the IJ did not err in demanding additional corroborating evidence where the petitioner’s asylum narrative was not credible
• \The sole test for admission of evidence is whether the evidence is probative and its admission is fundamentally fair.\
• “The sole test for admission of evidence [in immigration proceedings] is whether the evidence is probative and its admission is fundamentally -4- fair.” (quoting Espinoza v. INS, 45 F.3d 308, 310 (9th Cir. 1995))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).