Little v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was no Confrontation Clause violation when officer’s testimony did not actually repeat any out-of-court statement by Cl and only provided explanation for officer’s conduct in approaching defendant’s vehicle
• admission of officer’s testimony that he approached defendant’s car based upon information provided by confidential informant did not violate Confrontation Clause because it was admitted merely to explain officer’s conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Freeman v. the State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-10-31· cited 23×
• Boggs v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-06-30· cited 13×
• Jennings v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-06-11· cited 9×
• Commonwealth v. Pelletier
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2008-01-15· cited 8×
• Alvarez v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-11-15· cited 6×
• Moore v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-02-09· cited 5×
• McGhee v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-05-18· cited 1×
• Onza McGhee v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-05-18

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Crawford v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
• United States v. Sean Lamont Cromer
  Sixth Circuit· 2004-11-30· cited 436×
• Teague v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1984-05-01· cited 162×
• Pitts v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2006-02-27· cited 40×
• Turner v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-02-01· cited 30×
• Ivory v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-10-26· cited 13×
• Binns v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-04-22· cited 10×
• Tutu v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-10-12· cited 8×