Little v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting Skaggs, Wills, and Jasper, and noting that this Court has not yet rejected the focus of the investigation test but has implicitly done so by reaffirming custodial interrogation requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jackson v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2006-03-29· cited 62×
• Callihan v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2004-08-26· cited 12×
• Gomez v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2004-10-01· cited 2×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Escobedo v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 5,250×
• Oregon v. Mathiason
  Supreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 2,680×
• Stansbury v. California
  Supreme Court· 1994-04-26· cited 2,603×
• Beckwith v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1976-04-21· cited 1,005×
• Skaggs v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1985-05-23· cited 136×
• Grooms v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1988-09-08· cited 78×
• Wells v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1995-02-16· cited 32×
• Hourigan v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1998-01-22· cited 17×
• Farler v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1994-05-27· cited 14×
• Jasper v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1971-09-24· cited 8×
• Wills v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1973-11-23· cited 5×