Littell v. Littell (In Re Littell)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Had movants used due diligence, they could have obtained the necessary information for timely preparation of a complaint.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Farhid
  N.D. California· 1994-08-02· cited 20×
• In Re Grillo
  E.D. New York· 1997-09-12· cited 16×
• In Re Leary
  D. Massachusetts· 1995-08-24· cited 16×
• In Re Desiderio
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1997-06-12· cited 14×
• In Re Mendelsohn
  S.D. New York· 1996-11-04· cited 14×
• In Re Woods
  N.D. Florida· 2001-03-16· cited 9×
• In Re Stonham
  D. Colorado· 2004-11-29· cited 7×
• In Re Garner
  W.D. Texas· 2006-03-22· cited 5×
• In Re Denike
  M.D. Florida· 2005-01-05· cited 3×
• Huntington National Bank v. Lewis (In Re Lewis)
  S.D. Ohio· 1997-03-04· cited 2×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Figueroa
  S.D. New York· 1983-09-20· cited 64×
• In Re Floyd
  N.D. Texas· 1984-03-16· cited 29×
• Edwards v. Whitfield (In Re Whitfield)
  W.D. Arkansas· 1984-08-10· cited 28×
• Vaccariello v. Lagrotteria (In Re Lagrotteria)
  N.D. Illinois· 1984-09-21· cited 10×