· 9/12/1997
In Re Grillo
Citations
- 212 B.R. 744
- 1997 Bankr. LEXIS 1450
- 1997 WL 574781
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- denying extension where the creditor waited until five days prior to expiration to file an extension
- no cause where, except for filing a Rule 2004 motion five days before the deadline, creditor sat on its rights and made no effort to obtain information
- “there can be no cause justifying an extension of time to object to discharge where the party seeking the extension failed to diligently pursue discovery prior to expiration of the deadline.”
- “The majority view is that there can be no cause justifying an extension of time to object to discharge where the party seeking the extension failed to diligently pursue discovery prior to expiration of the deadline.”
- “The majority view is that there can be no cause justifying an extension of time to object to discharge where the party seeking the extension failed to diligently pursue discovery prior to expiration of the deadline.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jerome Feller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.